APEC Project Proposal |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project No. | CTI 06 2012T | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Title | APEC Wine Regulatory Forum – Public-Private Dialogue: Risk Management and Certification Requirements for Regional Trade in Wine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Status | Completed Project | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication (if any) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fund Account | TILF Special Account | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-fund | None | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Year | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Session | Session 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| APEC Funding | 122,925 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Co-funding Amount | 123,794 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Project Value | 246,719 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsoring Forum | Sub-Committee on Standards and Conformance (SCSC) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Topics | Standards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Committee | Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Fora Involved | Not Applicable / Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Non-APEC Stakeholders Involved | Not Applicable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Proposing Economy(ies) | New Zealand | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Co-Sponsoring Economies | Australia;Chile;United States | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expected Start Date | 09/03/2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expected Completion Date | 31/12/2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Proponent Name 1 | Mr David Reid | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Job Title 1 | Foreign Policy Officer | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization 1 | Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Postal Address 1 | PO Box 1473, Wellington 6140, New Zealand/ Private Bag 18901, Wellington 5045, New Zealand | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Telephone 1 | +64 4 439 8596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fax 1 | +64 4 499 8508 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Email 1 | david.reid@mfat.govt.nz | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Proponent Name 2 | Ms Sirma Karapeeva | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Job Title 2 | Senior Policy Analyst | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organization 2 | Ministry of Economic Development | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Postal Address 2 | PO Box 1473, Wellington 6140, New Zealand/ Private Bag 18901, Wellington 5045, New Zealand | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Telephone 2 | +64 4 470 2283 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fax 2 | +64 4 499 8508 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Email 2 | sirma.karapeeva@med.govt.nz | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Declaration | Ms Sirma Karapeeva / Mr David Reid | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Summary | The Seminar will build on the momentum and the recommendations arising from the 2011 APEC Wine Regulatory Forum (WRF). As an regulator-industry collaboration initiative, it will focus on two key themes identified at the WRF as being specific issues in wine regulation that require further exploration and discussion:
2. Coordinating Approaches to Certification (simplifying certification requirements between APEC economies; trade facilitative approaches to certification; maximum residue levels).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Relevance | APEC region trade in rice, grape and other fruit wine is growing dramatically in importance for both exporting and importing economies. In 2010, the total wine trade in the APEC region rose to US $18 billion from US $7 billion in 2000. This has seen an increase in the value of wine exports from APEC economies soaring from US $1.1 billion in 2000 to US $3.6 billion in 2010, an increase of 223%. A good proportion of this is the result of wine exports from Asian APEC Member Economies which has climbed nearly fourfold to approximately US $665 million. APEC Member Economies now account for 24% by volume but 33% by value of all global wine imports. Furthermore, wine consumption in the region is forecast to grow by around 20% over the next five years. Wine trade, however, tends to be burdened by major costs. TBT and SPS issues restrict sales and significantly increase costs for testing and labelling. In addition, compositional and residue limit standards vary from economy to economy and the number of new regulations increases each year. Wine-related non-tariff barriers in the region – such as divergent, redundant and non-transparent standards and testing protocols - are estimated to cost APEC economies and businesses a combined total of US $1 billion per year. The different risk assessment and management strategies that underpin the various regulatory regimes often require multiple testing and certification. This comes at a significant cost for business who trade in those markets, could lead to delays in entry to market, and can also discourage smaller players altogether from entering the market. The focus on risk therefore is aimed at identifying the key elements in each economy’s strategy that could be aligned so as reduce the unnecessary burdens for business. Promotion of transparent and consistent regulation and enforcement, the elimination of trade barriers arising from unnecessary certification and/or analytical requirements and greater cooperation around compositional and other requirements (such as the Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) can greatly reduce those cross-border delays and costs. From a regulatory perspective, promoting a better understanding of different approaches to wine regulation will enhance capacity to regulate in line with international best practice and to achieve public health and safety objectives. This will promote greater economic integration across the region. From a consumer perspective, better aligned regulations will mean more product choice, lower prices and greater certainty as to the quality and safety of products on the market. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Objectives | The Seminar will build on the APEC discussions to date and will respond to recommendations arising from the 2011 Wine Regulatory Forum (WRF) meeting which was held in September 2011 in San Francisco, USA. The Seminar is an important vehicle for on-going information sharing, capacity building and coordination among regulators on best practices concerning wine regulation. As such, the key objectives of the Seminar are: 1. To examine different issues relating to the nature and significance of risk and how to manage it in the least trade-restrictive way while ensuring that consumers are provided with same and trustworthy products. Participants will examine different strategies for the assessment and management of risk with a view to identifying best practices. In this context, participants will enhance their understanding of different regulatory approaches as well as key recommendations and guidelines issued by relevant international organisations; 2. To further elaborate the Compendium of Certification Requirements developed by the WRF in 2011 with an eye towards eliminating unnecessary barriers to trade by simplifying certification requirements between APEC economies. Participants will explore options for greater cooperation regarding certification and will share information on agricultural compound MRL regulations or requirements with a view to promoting better coordination in approaches; and 3. To develop a set of recommendations for future activities by the WRF aimed at tackling wine-related non-tariff barriers in the region. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alignment | In 2009, APEC Leaders recognised the importance of reducing technical barriers to trade to the continued prosperity of APEC. The following year, Ministers Responsible for Trade emphasised the need to promote regional economic integration through efforts to reduce unnecessary technical barriers, including through greater regulatory cooperation. In 2011, APEC Ministers committed to concrete actions to strengthen economic integration and expand trade, including through advancing regulatory convergence and cooperation to achieve economic growth in the region. Specific mention was made to promoting regulatory cooperation on wine and Ministers instructed officials to make further progress to reduce needless technical barriers to wine trade in 2012.
The 2011 APEC Leaders’ Honolulu Declaration and AMM Statement on Regulatory Cooperation and Convergence confirmed the value placed on regulatory convergence and cooperation as a means to strengthen economic growth in the region.
The Seminar will help to implement the directions contained in the 2011 APEC Leaders’ Honolulu Declaration and AMM Statement on Regulatory Cooperation and Convergence, one of the three main priority areas for APEC in 2011, and an issue for which Russia, as host of APEC 2012, has also expressed on-going support. The Seminar will contribute to these goals by sharing information and experiences, discussing economy-wide and regional approaches to wine regulation and identifying scope for better regulatory alignment in the region.
The Seminar also responds to an on-going SCSC work programme aimed at reducing technical barriers to trade in wine. The Wine Regulatory Forum was established in 2008 to provide an avenue for regulatory cooperation among APEC members. The WRF is included in the SCSC TFAP II and in its plan for greater Integration with Business. The Seminar will also contribute to the SCSC’s work plan of Promoting Good Regulatory Practices, alignment to international standards, increased business engagement in regulatory activities, and will discuss the use of international conformity assessment mechanisms. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TILF/ASF Justification | The Seminar will build on the APEC discussions to date and will respond to recommendations arising from the 2011 Wine Regulatory Forum (WRF) meeting which was held in September 2011 in San Francisco, USA. The Seminar is an important vehicle for on-going information sharing, capacity building and coordination among regulators on best practices concerning wine regulation. As such, the key objectives of the Seminar are: 1. To examine different issues relating to the nature and significance of risk and how to manage it in the least trade-restrictive way while ensuring that consumers are provided with same and trustworthy products. Participants will examine different strategies for the assessment and management of risk with a view to identifying best practices. In this context, participants will enhance their understanding of different regulatory approaches as well as key recommendations and guidelines issued by relevant international organisations; 2. To further elaborate the Compendium of Certification Requirements developed by the WRF in 2011 with an eye towards eliminating unnecessary barriers to trade by simplifying certification requirements between APEC economies. Participants will explore options for greater cooperation regarding certification and will share information on agricultural compound MRL regulations or requirements with a view to promoting better coordination in approaches; and 3. To develop a set of recommendations for future activities by the WRF aimed at tackling wine-related non-tariff barriers in the region. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beneficiaries and Outputs | The direct beneficiaries of this project are government officials and regulators from all 21 APEC Member Economies who are involved with or have an interest in good regulatory practice in the wine sector. These officials are from the government agencies responsible for policy and regulation in this area, for instance Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, New Zealand (MAF), General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of People’s Republic of China (AQSIQ), Bureau of Standards, Metrology & Inspection of the Ministry of economic Affairs in Chinese Taipei (BSMI), Directorate of Standards, Metrology and Quality in Viet Nam (STAMEQ and Alcohol and Tobacco Tax & Trade Bureau in USA (TTB). This seminar targets officials who are directly responsible for developing the policy and implementing the regulations. The Seminar will provide these beneficiaries with the opportunities to share information and learn from others’ experiences and will enable them to apply this knowledge to their own regulations. It will also be an opportunity to foster a network of regulators that will be able to continue the dialogue and progress future cooperation and capacity building activities. Some developing economies within the APEC community are relatively new to wine regulation and bring some different perspectives to the table, ranging from how they define wine to how wine is culturally perceived in their economies. This seminar represents an opportunity to develop mutual understanding of these differences as well as to explore mechanisms for working through them where they may represent obstacles to trade. Wine producers, importers and other business stakeholders will also benefit from the Seminar as they will gain a better understanding of regulatory requirements in the region. They will also have the opportunity to meet and network with key regulatory bodies thereby establishing on-going relationships. This will add weight to initiatives such as the TTB-lead regulators teleconference started after the first Wine Regulators Forum in San Francisco providing further concrete information & networking opportunities. In the long term, industry and consumers will benefit from better regulatory alignment in the region which will see reduction in compliance costs, increases in consumer choice and appropriate management of health and safety issues. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dissemination | The key target audiences will be APEC representatives from food safety/wine regulatory agencies, industry representatives and APEC trade representatives from all APEC economies that produce, export and import wine. A report of the Seminar will be prepared and presented to the SCSC, CTI and other interested APEC fora for their information and discussion. Materials from the Seminar will be made available at no cost to all APEC Member Economies via the APEC Member Document Database as well as industry websites such as the NZ Winegrowers and the World Wine Trade Group. The project will comply with APEC publication, copyright and logo guidelines. The findings of the seminar will be used to inform the WRF forward work plan and, in particular, identify opportunities for capacity building activities in the region. The report will highlight key common concerns and areas where further work is needed and will recommend appropriate next steps to address these concerns. This will help beneficiaries to focus their efforts going forward, including as a tool for developing sound harmonised regulatory policy. Consideration will be given to communicating the outcomes to other industries as a case study in future conferences on Good Regulatory Practice. Consideration will also be given to briefing general or specialist media about the project as well as providing media releases. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gender | Project overseers will implement this project in a manner that takes gender considerations into account to ensure that it benefits both women and men and does not disadvantage women. During the planning stages, project overseers, one of which is a woman, will seek to achieve gender balance in the selection of workshop speakers and participants. Both men and women are well represented among current WRF Member Economies and equal participation of both men and women in the Seminar will be actively pursued. Project Overseers will also include women in the planning, management, allocation of resources and implementation of the project. Care will be given to ensure that the Seminar and all related administrative details are performed in a gender-neutral manner and in particular, in a manner that does not disadvantage women. Women, as members of the regulatory and business communities, civil society, academia, and as consumers, will benefit from the more open, well-functioning, transparent, and competitive markets that the Seminar encourages. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Work Plan | The key milestones for the Project include: Liaise with APEC economies regarding the seminar and begin logistical arrangements (Jan-Mar 2012); consult and develop seminar agenda (April-June); invite speakers and participants (July-Aug); finalise seminar agenda and logistics (Sep-Oct); host seminar (Nov); distribute seminar outcomes, final report and post documents on-line (Nov-Dec). A detailed breakdown is provided in Risks section |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Risks |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monitoring and Evaluation | The projects monitoring and evaluation plan will include: - Keeping track of progress against the key milestones identified above and taking corrective action if necessary;
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Linkages | Engagement During the project development phase, the Project Overseers will engage with and seek participation from other APEC fora with an interest in eliminating behind-the-border trade barriers and promoting good regulatory practices. These include the Committee on Trade and Investment, the Market Access Group and the FSCF. Participation will also be sought from the SCSC Specialist Regional Bodies (SRBs). With regard to fora outside of APEC, the Project Overseers will reach out to the World Wine Trade Group and the Codex to raise awareness of the Seminar and to promote coordination and synergies between the respective work programmes. The Project Overseers will also engage with the private sector in the APEC region. Opinions, assistance and participation from APEC and non-APEC fora and the private sector will be sought during the project planning and implementation stages. APEC Member Economies are expected to encourage their business stakeholders to attend the Seminar as participants and speakers.
Previous work The Seminar builds on the work and recommendations of the 2011 WRF meeting which was held in September 2011, San Francisco, USA. The WRF developed a set of principles and a forward-looking work plan to simply and better align regulatory practices to achieve greater efficiency in wine trade. The recommendations include: increasing information exchange on regulatory developments and labelling issues in order to increase confidence among regulators; eliminating or reducing the need for export certification, possibly by achieving mutual acceptance of oenological practices under appropriate conditions, or by consolidating the information on various certificates into one; accepting an electronic means for the submission of export certificates; and identifying opportunities to continue the dialogue on these issues including identifying capacity building needs and activities. The Seminar will build on the outcomes of the 2011 WRF recommendations by taking a more in-depth look at key areas of common concern such as risk management and certification requirements. This will achieve on-going momentum of the initiative while avoiding duplication of previous work.
APEC’s comparative advantage The project is focused on an area of growing trade in the APEC region. In 2010, the total wine trade in the APEC region rose to US $18 billion. During the same period, the value of wine exports from APEC economies soared to US $3.6 billion. In terms of imports, APEC economies now account for 24% by volume but 33% by value of all global wine imports. Furthermore, wine consumption in the region is forecast to grow by around 20% over the next five years.
Undertaking this project in APEC provides a unique opportunity to bring together regulators from economies with established wine industries and those from emerging wine producing economies as well as importing Member Economies to share information and experiences, particularly as many of the emerging wine producers are Asian APEC Member Economies. This work supports APEC’s overarching goal of liberalising trade and investment in the region and promoting regional economic growth and integration.
The project also supports a number of on-going SCSC initiatives, namely:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sustainability | It is expected that once the momentum is consolidated in 2012, on-going engagement and convergence will be achieved by way of regular electronic contact between regulators, which is already underway, as well as appropriately scheduled meetings. In addition, expressions of interest will be sought at this coming WRF for hosting and participation in the next WRF, to take place in 2013 or 2014. The Compendium of Certification Requirements, which will be brought up to date during the Seminar, will be made available as a resource for exporters and regulators. As far as practicable, and subject to confidentiality concerns, information gathered at the Seminar will also be made available on the internet. The Compendium is useful information resource tool that sets out the key elements of certification requirements in the region; As such it provides transparency and clarity. It also identifies areas where regulatory alignment can be pursued. This database can be kept up to date electronically by regulators, either at regular intervals or as certification requirements are changed. The exercise of bringing the Compendium up to date represents an opportunity for discussion and for economies to seek clarification from one another where any doubts exist. Once the Compendium is agreed by members as a true and comprehensive representation of requirements, this will be a helpful reference point when any out of the ordinary documentation is sought in the future. Consideration will be given to regulator exchanges and other capacity building mechanisms, as well as other means of sharing information in order to continue building on the outputs and outcomes of the Seminar. Project Overseers will work with the WRF secretariat in Australia to build a plan of follow up activities and to look at the hosting of future regulatory forums. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Overseers | Ms Sirma Karapeeva is a Senior Analyst with the Trade Environment Team of the Ministry of Economic Development where she leads the team’s international technical barriers to trade agenda. She has extensive experience with the negotiation of TBT provisions in free trade agreements as well as the negotiation of government to government arrangements such as mutual recognition arrangement and regulatory cooperation arrangements. Ms Karapeeva represents New Zealand at the APEC Sub-Committee on Standards and Conformance (SCSC) and at the WTO TBT Committee. Mr David Reid is a Foreign Policy Officer at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. At the Ministry he has worked at the Ministry’s Economic Division and as a project manager looking after leverage and legacy for the Rugby World Cup, including logistics and management of international VIPs. In his current role David deals with Agricultural Trade, and takes a close interest in wine issues. Other key members of the Project Team include: - Wade Armstrong, Principal Advisor Trade Policy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and - Kay Shapland, Manager Food Production and Processing, Ministry of - Kate Smith, Senior Advisor, Wine and Plant, Ministry of Agriculture and - Chris Langley, Head of APEC Unit, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
- John Barker, General Counsel, New Zealand Winegrowers
- Kristy McKay, Trade and Advocacy Manager, New Zealand Winegrowers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost Efficiency | This project offers APEC the maximum value for money and maximises cost efficiency by:
- Holding the Seminar alongside another international event for wine regulators - Seeking a level of self-financing from supporters continuing to labour, travel - Using Seminar participants as presenters and moderators thereby enhancing - Using an electronic post-event survey; and
- Dissemination of Seminar material on-line. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Drawdown Timetable | Not Applicable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct Labour | Not Applicable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Waivers | We seek approval of a waiver in relation to travel expenses for Officials from Governments and International Organisations and for active participants from travel-eligible Member Economies to receive per diems prior to travel. This will assist with good planning by allowing the travel eligible regulators to budget ahead and consequently allowing the organisers to confirm attendance and plan ahead. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Are there any supporting document attached? | No | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||