* Atleast Project Title is Required.
|
Project No. |
EPWG 06 2021A
|
Project Title |
Recovery and Resilience: Risk-Smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19
|
Project Status |
Project in Implementation
|
Publication (if any) |
|
Fund Account |
APEC Support Fund
|
Sub-fund |
ASF: APEC Cooperation on Combating COVID-19 and Economic Recovery (CCER)
|
Project Year |
2021
|
Project Session |
Session 2
|
APEC Funding |
32,900
|
Co-funding Amount |
0
|
Total Project Value |
32,900
|
Sponsoring Forum |
Emergency Preparedness Working Group (EPWG)
|
Topics |
Emergency Preparedness
|
Committee |
SOM Steering Committee on Economic and Technical Cooperation (SCE)
|
Other Fora Involved |
|
Other Non-APEC Stakeholders Involved |
|
Proposing Economy(ies) |
China
|
Co-Sponsoring Economies |
Chile; Malaysia; Russia
|
Expected Start Date |
01/04/2022
|
Expected Completion Date |
30/06/2023
|
Project Proponent Name 1 |
Zhang Xiaoning
|
Job Title 1 |
Director General
|
Organization 1 |
National Disaster Reduction Center, Ministry of Emergency Management of China
|
Postal Address 1 |
Not Applicable
|
Telephone 1 |
(86-10) 52811003
|
Fax 1 |
Not Applicable
|
Email 1 |
zhangxiaoning@ndrcc.org.cn or guanyan@ndrcc.org.cn
|
Project Proponent Name 2 |
Not Applicable
|
Job Title 2 |
Not Applicable
|
Organization 2 |
Not Applicable
|
Postal Address 2 |
Not Applicable
|
Telephone 2 |
Not Applicable
|
Fax 2 |
Not Applicable
|
Email 2 |
Not Applicable
|
Declaration |
Zhang Xiaoning
|
Project Summary |
As the backbone of APEC economy, the business community, especially small and medium enterprises (SMEs), contributed enormously to the COVID-19 prevention and control but also suffered from the continued adverse impacts of the pandemic. For SMEs to build resilience against the impacts of such risks as natural disasters and public health contingency, and achieve sustainability in the post pandemic era, government departments, technical support agencies and SMEs themselves should all make due efforts. The project will hold a two-day hybrid Workshop on Risk-Smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 in Beijing, China for knowledge sharing and technical discussion on challenges facing SMEs and measures that government, technical agencies and enterprises could take to help build SMEs’ resilience. To lay a solid foundation for this project to achieve practical outcomes, China will develop Risk-informed Decision Making Framework for Resilience and Research Report on Methodology or Tools for Risk-informed Preparedness (names tbc) by using its own funds. The project will leverage on above-mentioned outputs to develop effective and feasible policy, technical and operational recommendations for resilient and sustainable recovery of SMEs in the post COVID and present them in Project Report.
|
Relevance |
Relevance – Region: According to the UNDRR, if the global community is to improve the lives and livelihoods of people in emerging and developing economies, risk in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) must be tackled (UNDRR, 2020). As the bedrock of global, national and local markets, the business community is hit harder, suffer longer and is slower to recover than other communities especially when disasters strike. Lessons learned in these trying times show that decades of development gains may be wiped out in an instant unless the development is made resilient, risk-informed and climate-smart. To assist with effective and resilient recovery of SMEs in the post COVID-19, the project will hold a two-day Workshop on Risk-Smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 to bring together authorities, businesses, technical agencies and the academia from EPWG member economies as well as representatives from regional and international organizations to discuss about: a) The importance of raising risk awareness and enhancing risk knowledge of government authorities so as to make risk-informed decision and investment; b) How the combined forces of disasters and public health contingency affected the business community, especially SMEs, and how they could build back better; c) SMEs participation in the post COVID-19 risk-resilience building; d) With guidance from government and technical agencies, how business continuity plans and business investment could adapt to the new normal of interconnected and mounting disaster risks; e) Science, technology and innovation (STI) applied to promote resilient and risk-smart business recovery; f) Economic incentives, disaster risk financing and risk transfer tools to help SMEs prevent, prepare for, respond to and recover from such risks as natural disasters and public health contingency. Relevance – Eligibility and Fund Priorities: The proposed project seeks ASF Sub-Fund on APEC Cooperation on Combating COVID-19 and Economic Recovery (CCER). It is eligible for ASF CCER as it supports capacity building needs for APEC developing economies, echoes the fund priorities of expediting regional economic recovery, building resilience against future large-scale economic disruptions, and poses high potential to cover all member economies and several APEC sub-fora (SMEWG, HWG, PPWE, PPSTI, etc) under the theme of risk-smart business for SMEs in the post COVID-19. Relevance – Capacity Building: The project will focus on SMEs from the following three perspectives: First, risk-informed decision making at government level to support SMEs build resilience against future risks and promote their sustainability in the post-pandemic era. Second, risk identification, monitoring and assessment tools or methodology at technical agency level to provide evidence-based emergency preparedness recommendations for the society and the industry, including SMEs. Third, resilience capacity building at SME level to strengthen supply chain, improve risk management, and raise awareness for risk-smart business. With these discussion points, the project will seek to address the following capacity building issues: 1. Improved understanding of the adverse impacts of the COVID on SMEs; 2. Possible and applicable suggestions for SMEs to not only build back better from such risks as the COVID, but also achieve sustainability against future major disasters and public health contingency; and 3. Raising awareness of policy makers, practitioners, SME leaders and staff about risk-informed decision making, emergency preparedness and risk-smart business.
|
Objectives |
Through the workshop and guidelines developed by this project, it hopes to provide guidance and suggestions for decision makers, practitioners and SMEs in APEC community about adaptation to post-pandemic landscape, risk-informed decision making, and integrating a risk-smart and climate-resilient philosophy into the post-COVID-19 business models and practices.
|
Alignment |
Alignment - APEC: The project is mandated by the 2020 AELM Declaration paragraph 14, APEC Putrajaya Vision 2040 paragraph 4, and the third pillar of Aotearoa Plan of Action which encourages the following collective actions: “Cooperate in relevant APEC fora to develop, encourage and exchange best practice policies, and promote capacity building programmes, that address all environmental - climate change - and support sustainable growth.”. The project directly addresses sustainable development and resilient recovery issues in APEC economies, acknowledges the importance of implementing emergency measures designed to address COVID-19 challenges in the business sector, and will raise the awareness of implementing risk-informed and climate-smart measures to ensure that the business community is more immune to future large-scale risks. Alignment – Forum: In line with EPWG 2017-2020 Strategic Plan and APEC Disaster Risk Reduction Framework, the project will contribute to achieving the goal of “Adaptive and Disaster-Resilient Asia-Pacific Economies Supporting Inclusive and Sustainable Development”. It also aligns with EPWG Strategic Plan by: a) Promoting the development of effective business continuity and critical incident guides for enterprises; b) Contributing to reducing vulnerability and promoting resilience; c) Facilitating sharing of information, knowledge, expertise and experience learned from crises; Focusing on medium- to long-term recovery of economic activity in COVID affected sectors.
|
TILF/ASF Justification |
|
Beneficiaries and Outputs |
1. Outputs: The main outputs are: 1) Workshop on Risk-smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 The workshop will be delivered in a hybrid manner. Each session will be held both in-person and virtually. Panelists and participants from EPWG China, including representatives from EPWG China and from the private sector, the academia, international or regional organizations based in China, will attend physically in Beijing. Other panelists and participants will be invited to join via video link. The workshop is expected to have at most 50 participants. To provide the common ground in advance, draft agenda, concept note and General Information Circular will be sent 8 weeks before the workshop to serve as a survey/ interview on the concerns of panelists and participants. Specific discussion points/ questions for each panel will be sent to panelists 15 days before the workshop (or speakers) for their inputs. The outline of their answers/ inputs will also be circulated in advance to facilitate effective and efficient discussion. Purposes: To provide guidance and suggestions for decision makers, practitioners and SMEs in APEC community about adaptation to post-pandemic landscape, risk-informed decision making, and integrating a risk-smart and climate-resilient philosophy into the post-COVID-19 business models and practices. Duration: 2 days Target audience: Government officials from APEC member economies, mainly from emergency management authorities and enterprises, trade and industry related departments; Practitioners from technical agencies that have expertise in risk information management, monitoring and assessment; Representatives from private sector and business related research institutes; Representatives from member economies who are interested in SMEs resilience building in the post COVID. Draft Agenda EPWG 06 2021A: Workshop on Risk-smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 October, 2022 (tbc) Day 1 14:00 – 16:00 (Beijing Time) | | 13:00 – 14:00 | Test run | | 14:00 – 14:05 | Welcoming Remarks | | 14:05 – 14:10 | Opening Remarks | | 14:10 – 16:00 | Panel Discussion I: Risk-informed Decision Making Towards Resilience (1 moderator + 6 panelists) a) Keynote speech from EPWG China: Risk-informed Decision Making Framework Towards Resilience b) Panel discussion: the importance of raising risk awareness and enhancing risk knowledge of government authorities so as to make risk-informed decision and investment | | Day 2 14:00 – 16:30 (Beijing Time) | | 13:00 – 14:00 | Test run | 14:00 – 15:20 | Panel Discussion 2: Risk-smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID (1 moderator + 6 panelists) Discussion Point 1: Vision for business development in the post COVID-19: challenges and difficulties a) How the combined forces of disasters and the pandemic unseen in a century have affected the business community, especially SMEs; b) How to promote a broad, increased, active and sufficient participation of the business community in resilient APEC recovery while enterprises still dealing with risks on multiple fronts; Discussion Point 2: Way forward for risk-smart business in the post COVID-19: opportunities and guidance a) What is risk-smart business and how it can be achieved; b) Suggestions for business continuity plan adaptive to the post COVID-19 landscape; c) Suggestions for risk-informed and climate-resilient business models and practices; d) Suggestions for science, technology and innovation (STI) applied to promote resilient and risk-smart business recovery; E) Suggestions for using economic incentives, disaster risk financing and risk transfer tools to help SMEs prevent, prepare for, respond to and recover from risks | | 15:20 – 16:20 | Panel Discussion 3: Risk Monitoring and Assessment Tools or Methodology Towards Risk-informed Preparedness (1 moderator + 6 panelists) a) Keynote speech from EPWG China: Research on Methodology or Tools for Risk-informed Preparedness b) Panel discussion | | 16:20 – 16:30 | Closing Remarks | | | | | | 2) Best Practices Guideline (40 – 50 pages) Expediting resilient recovery of SMEs especially in the post-pandemic is not just a daunting task facing SMEs themselves. It requires whole-of society and whole-of industry efforts. The guideline will be developed by this APEC-funded project team to provide guidance and reference on supporting SMEs resilience building and risk-smart business at government, technical and business community level. As stated in the cover letter, EPWG China will do research on risk-informed decision making framework towards resilience and risk assessment tools by using its own funds. To avoid the low applicability of the Guideline to larger APEC community, the project team has invited experts and consultants from Tohoku University of Japan, National Climate Change Commission of the Philippines, Swiss Academy of Engineering Sciences, UNDP Bangkok Regional Hub, UNDRR Asia-Pacific Regional Office, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific of FAO, who have expertise and experience in carrying out relevant work from global and regional perspective. During the preceding self-funded project “Regional Economic Integration through the Lens of Disaster Resilience (EPWG 01 21S)”, EPWG China also did research on disaster resilience capacity building of the business community, which was a relatively general one focusing on challenges faced by enterprises, major components of resilient capacity building, and influencing factors of business resilience. By carrying out this self-funded project, the PO finds it necessary to study business resilience from a broader, more comprehensive and more targeted perspective and recognizes the role of government decision making and technology application in this process. By leveraging the above-mentioned outcomes, this guideline may include: I. Table of Contents II. Executive Summary (by Mr. ZHANG Xiaoning, Project Overseer, 2020-2021 EPWG Co-Chair) III. Recommendations at government level: Risk-informed Decision Making Framework Towards Resilience (name tbc, relevant research and activities will be self-funded by EPWG China) IV. Recommendations at technical level: Research Report on Methodology or Tools for Risk-informed Preparedness (name tbc, relevant research and activities will be self-funded by EPWG China) V. Recommendations for SMEs to go forward (based on Workshop outcomes) VI. Summary 3) Workshop Report (20 pages) The outcomes of the Workshop on Risk-smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 will presented in this Workshop Reports. It may include: I. Table of Contents II. Executive Summary III. Workshop Activities: background, objectives, preparation, participation and gender, highlights of panel discussions, etc. IV. Panelists and Participants Survey V. Lessons form the Workshop VI. Appendix: workshop agenda, workshop concept note, list of participants, outline of answers (provided by panelists before the workshop), post-workshop survey, etc. 4) Project Report (30 pages) The Project Report is for final review and summary. It may include: I. Table of Contents II. Executive Summary III. Introduction: background, objectives, preparations, outcomes and outputs. IV. Best Practices Guideline V. Workshop on Risk-smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 VI. Review and Conclusion VII. Appendix VIII. Reference Outcomes: a. The best practices and insights shared during the Workshop will be presented and summarized in the form of Workshop Report which will be a regional reference. b. The Workshop will bring together participants from various sectors to raise awareness of understanding, preparing for and managing risks at government, technical and enterprises levels. c. The Workshop will contribute to providing applicable suggestions for government authorities, technical practitioners and SMEs, especially in APEC member economies, to support their adaptation to the post-pandemic new normal. Beneficiaries: Primary beneficiaries: Workshop panelists and participants Secondary beneficiaries: policy makers and practitioners from emergency management and business-related agencies in APEC economies who will contribute to and may benefit from Best Practices Guideline, Workshop Report and Project Report. For further reference, both primary and secondary beneficiaries listed here may include: a) emergency management ministries/ committees; b) industry, commerce and trade related ministries/ research institutes; c) disaster reduction and resilience related international and regional organizations like UNDP, UNDRR, UN-SPIDER, ADRC, IFRC, UNICEF, WFP, GIZ and ASEAN; d) enterprises/ agencies with rich experience in supply chain resilience and capacity building such as Jingdong Logistics, Lenovo Group, Property and Casualty Company Limited (PICC), Swiss Re Group and Munich Re Group; e) SMEs such as Ramunion (international humanitarian rescue), China Network of Community Safety and Protection, and other representatives from enterprises that may be nominated by member economies to attend the Workshop.
|
Dissemination |
The dissemination plan of this project consists of: a) Workshop: Formal invitations will be sent, and dissemination will be made on social networks inviting them to register for the events. Workshop scenarios (draft agenda, concept note, General Information Circular, discussion points/ questions and outline of answers) will be sent to panelists and participants before the event. After the Workshop, Workshop Report will be made on APEC website indicating the panel's outputs, accompanied by a photo of the virtual session. b) Best Practices Guideline: Electronic copies of this guideline is expected to be made available on APEC website with endorsement from EPWG member economies and the APEC Secretariat. Confidentiality issues will be properly managed. c) Workshop Report and Project Report: Electronic copies will be uploaded to the APEC website for further dissemination. Confidentiality issues will be properly managed. d) Published Magazine Articles: Guest writers will be invited to publish three articles on DRR in China Magazine. The magazine is administered by National Disaster Reduction Center, Ministry of Emergency Management of China with readers from emergency preparedness departments at central, provincial, municipal and county level, emergency management industries, enterprises and universities, research institutes of risk monitoring, assessment and early warning. Hence the project team foresees that all articles will be published and the success indicator will be the number of circulation. The three articles will respectively elaborate on: executive summary on risk-smart business for SMEs in the post-pandemic era, risk-informed decision making framework towards resilience, and recommendations on risk assessment methodology or tools for risk-informed preparedness. Guest writers will be the PO and experts engaged in this project. No intention to sell the outputs of this project.
|
Gender |
Many women are taking active leadership or participation in both disaster risk reduction and business sustainability. Therefore, women from APEC economies are strongly encouraged to participate in the Workshop. In addition, an effort will be made to incorporate women from the business community, especially SMEs, into the Workshop to master the language of risk-smart business to expand the opportunities for their activities after this project. PO is also committed to collecting sex disaggregated data for all speakers and participants (not only those funded by APEC) at the project event. This data will be included when submitting a Completion Report to the Secretariat upon completion of the project, as well as providing guidance to future POs on their own gender parity targets. In this framework, the objectives of participation are: Targets | Female Participants (%) | 50 | Female Speakers/Experts (%) | 50 | Referring to the Guide on Gender Criteria for APEC Project Proposals in the Guidebook on APEC Projects, please tick the pillar or pillars that this project supports, in promoting women’s economic empowerment: | 5 Pillars (you may tick more than one) | 1 | Access to Capital and Assets | | 2 | Access to Markets | | 3 | Skills, Capacity Building, and Health | | 4 | Leadership, Voice and Agency | Yes | 5 | Innovation and Technology | | To contribute to the enhancement of women leadership and visibility, the project will be committed to achieving 50 percent of female panelists (speakers) and 50 percent of all participants. In Best Practices Guideline, section II, III and V will be led and developed by women representatives from the project team to raise their voice in relevant priority areas. Both in the implementation of this project and development of the outputs, suggestions and inputs from women who work in the government departments, international and regional organizations, the academia and the private sector will be fully respected.
|
Work Plan |
Timeline | Activities | Deliverables | 1 April 2022 - 1 June 2022 | Selecting experts responsible for Best Practices Guideline (4 - 8 weeks, self-funded by EPWG China) | A signed contract | 1 April 2022 -30 September 2022 | Preparation for hosting Workshop on Risk-Smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 and drafting Best Practices Guidelines: a) Regular expert group discussions on Best Practices Guidelines and drafting outlines for the Guideline (partially self-funded by China, April 2022 - September 2022) b) Review the delivery format of the workshop (June 2022) c) Development of workshop scenarios (July 2022) d) Invitation to delegates from 21 EPWG member economies for inclusive and balanced participation (August 2022) e) Workshop scenarios circulated to panelists and participants for inputs and revision (August 2022) f) Identification and confirmation of panelists, participants and workshop scenarios (September 2022) g) Finalize APEC Monitoring Report | a) Draft agenda b) Concept note c) General Information Circular (GIC) d) Preemptive discussion points/ questions e) Event Attendance List f) Outlines of Best Practices Guideline g) Key note speech presentations h) APEC Monitoring Report | October 2022 | Hosting a two-day Workshop on Risk-Smart Business for SMEs in the Post COVID-19 (draft agenda and details attached in Outputs Section) | Workshop Implemented | 1 October 2022 | Submit the APEC Project Monitoring Report to the APEC Secretariat | APEC Project Monitoring Report | 1 November 2022 - 1 February 2023 | Review and summarize the workshop Post-workshop survey Finalize Best Practices Guidelines | Workshop Report (first version) Best Best Practices Guidelines (first version) | 1 February 2023 - 1 April 2023 | Editing and seeking inputs from experts and participants into Workshop Report (second version) and Best Practices Guidelines (second version) | Workshop Report (second version) Best Practices Guidelines (second version) | 1 April 2023 - 1 May 2023 | Circulate Workshop Report (second version) and Best Practices Guidelines (second version) to member economies for inputs Review and summarize the project Draft and finalize Project Report Submit Workshop Report (final), Best Practices Guidelines (final), Project Report to the APEC Secretariat for approval | Workshop Report (final) Best Practices Guidelines (final) Project Report (final) | 1 May 2023 - 30 June 2023 | Publish electronic copies of Workshop Report (final), Best Practices Guidelines (final) and Project Report on APEC website upon approval from the APEC Secretariat and EPWG member economies | | 30 June 2023 - 31 August 2023 | Draft and finalize the mandatory Completion Report Submit the APEC Project Completion Report and supporting documents to the APEC Secretariat | APEC Project Completion Report | 30 June 2023 - 30 June 2024 | Participation in the Long Term Evaluation of APEC Projects (LTEAP) survey | LTEAP Survey |
|
Risks |
Risk | Approach to manage | Readiness of members to share experience and best practices | a) Broad invitations and follow ups b) Pre-workshop survey via email with preemptive discussion points/ questions | Network stability during online workshop | Rehearsal and pre-meeting test runs | The COVID-19 pandemic | a) Generate hybrid meeting instances b) Review the delivery format 4 months before the workshop | Low applicability of recommendations to the Participants’ home economies | a) Identify specific concerns from EPWG member economies b) Make sure the panel discussions will cover such concerns in practical way c) Experts and consultants engaged in the project should take global vision |
|
Monitoring and Evaluation |
| Evaluation Focus | Indicators | Target Goals | Evaluation Method | Reporting | Outputs | 1. Workshop | 1. No. of panelists/ speakers engaged | 21 max | Event Attendance List | Completion Report | 2. No. of participants (including panelists/ speakers) engaged | 50 max | Event Attendance List | Completion Report | 3. No. of attending economies | 10 | Event Attendance List | Completion Report | 4. % of participating men/women | 50/50 | Event Attendance List | Completion Report | 5. Content developed and deployed | 30 Aug. 2022 | Certification by PO | Contract | 2. Workshop Report | 6. No. of pages | 20 | Certification by PO | Email to the Secretariat | 7. Submission to the Secretariat | 1 May 2023 | Submission to the Secretariat | Email to the Secretariat | 3. Project Report | 8. No. of pages | 30 | Certification by PO | Email to the Secretariat | 9. Submission to the Secretariat | 1 May 2023 | Submission to the Secretariat | Email to the Secretariat | 4. Best Practices Guideline | 10. No. of pages | 40-50 | Certification by PO | Email to the Secretariat | 11. Submission to the Secretariat | 1 May 2023 | Submission to the Secretariat | Email to the Secretariat | Outcomes | 1. Recommendations made on risk-informed decision making, risk assessment methodology for resilience, and SMEs resilient capacity building | 1. No. of recommendations made | 15 | Included in Best Practices Guideline and Workshop Report | Report to Working Group | 2. Participants knowledge of risk-informed emergency preparedness and an understanding on risk-smart SME development | 2. % of participants report substantial knowledge increase | 75% | ex-post evaluations | Workshop Report Completion Report | 3. No. and circulation of published magazine articles | 3 45,000 copies | ex-post evaluations | Workshop Report Completion Report | 4. % of women report substantial awareness increase | 33% | ex-post evaluations | Completion Report | Others | 1. Equal and balanced participation | 5. % of women leading or participating in project implementation | 50/50 | Included in Completion Report | Completion Report |
|
Linkages |
The project organizers will make close contact with Ministry of Emergency Management of China and other related departments to understand the best practices, policies and challenges related to risk-smart business in the post pandemic. Engagement: In line with topics under the three panel, this project seeks to cooperate with other APEC fora such as Small and Medium Enterprises Working Group (SMEWG), Policy Partnership on Science, Technology and Innovation (PPSTI), Policy Partnership on Women and the Economy (PPWE), Finance Ministers Process (FMP), APEC business Advisory Council (ABAC), APEC Climate Center and any other fora interested in the workshop. It will also invite representatives from UN agencies including UNDP, and other regional and international organizations in accordance with guidelines on non-APEC members participation. Previous work: Both EPWG and SMEWG have done many project research on business sustainability and disaster risks respectively. But amdist increasing systemic risks, a risk-informed philosophy needs to be introduced and incorporated into the business sector.
|
Sustainability |
The outputs of this project are expected to provide continued reference for government authorities, technical agencies and SMEs in APEC community. Post-pandemic sustainability and resilience of SMEs are to be achieved in a gradual manner, where we still have a long way to go to translate initiatives into actions. By encouraging the philosophy of risk-informed decision making, evidence-based emergency preparedness and resilient capacity building, the project could contribute to the first step of raising awareness and improving understanding. With government understanding the importance of risk-informed decision making and technical practitioners providing evidence-based risk and recovery information, SMEs will have more constructive suggestions to follow.
There will be a scheduled evaluation of project results in 3, 6, 12 months time.
|
Project Overseers |
Mr. Zhang Xiaoning, Project Overseer, 2020-2021 EPWG Co-Chair, Director General of National Disaster Reduction Center of China (NDRCC), Ministry of Emergency Management Contact information: zhangxiaoning@ndrcc.org.cn 8610-52811003 Mr. ZHANG Xiaoning has more than 30 years of experience in disaster risk reduction, capacity building and development, emergency management, climate risk resilience, disaster risk monitoring and international cooperation. He held Master Degree of Economics from 1985 to 1989 and since then worked as Deputy Director and Director in Ministry of Civil Affairs of China until 2018, Deputy Director General and Director General in NDRCC of Ministry of Emergency Management until now. From 2020-2021, he assumed EPWG Co-Chair and the PO of EPWG China self-funded project “Regional Economic Integration through the Lens of Disaster Resilience (EPWG 01 21S)”, in which he led research on disaster resilience capacity building for enterprises. Ms. Guan Yan, Project Overseer Assistant, 2022-2023 EPWG Co-Chair, Director of International Cooperation Department of National Disaster Reduction Center of China (NDRCC), Ministry of Emergency Management Contact information: guanyan@ndrcc.org.cn 8610-52811271
|
Cost Efficiency |
|
Drawdown Timetable |
|
Direct Labour |
Contractor – Short-Term Clerical No. | Scope of work | No. of Hours | Hourly Rate | Total Amount (US$) | 1. | Systematically review and edit Workshop Report, Best Practices Guideline and Project Report | 200 | 50 | 10,000 | Total Hours | 200 | 50 | 10,000 | Contractor – Event Logistics Provider No. | Scope of work | No. of Hours | Hourly Rate | Total Amount (US$) | 1. | Help the PO draft General Information Circular, draft agenda, Workshop scenario and preemptive discussion points | 15 | 40 | 600 | 2. | Identifying and contacting speakers, moderator and other participants for their availability to the Workshop | 5 | 40 | 200 | 3. | Help the PO circulate post-workshop survey and follow up monthly review (in 3, 6, 12 month time) of the project results | 10 | 40 | 400 | Total Hours | 1,200 |
|
Waivers |
|
Are there any supporting document attached? |
No
|
Attachments
|
|
|
|
|