Project Title

Global Medical Product Integrity and Supply Chain Security - Development of a Roadmap, Workshops, Guidance Documents and Toolkits 

Project Year

2012   

Project Number

M CTI 04 2012T 

Project Session

Session 3   

Project Type

Multi-Year 

Project Status

Completed Project   
View Budget TableView Budget Table
|
PrintPrint

Project No.

M CTI 04 2012T 

Project Title

Global Medical Product Integrity and Supply Chain Security - Development of a Roadmap, Workshops, Guidance Documents and Toolkits 

Project Status

Completed Project 

Publication (if any)

 

Fund Account

TILF Special Account 

Sub-fund

None 

Project Year

2012 

Project Session

Session 3 

Sponsoring Forum

Life Sciences Innovation Forum (LSIF) 

Topics

Life Sciences; Health 

Committee

Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI) 

Other Fora Involved

Health Working Group (HWG); Life Sciences Innovation Forum (LSIF) 

Other Non-APEC Stakeholders Involved

World Health Organisation
European Medicines Agency
Council of Europe
US Pharmacopeia
National Agency for Food and Drug Administration Control (NAFDAC, Nigeria)
Other interntional organisations and private sector non-profit organisations

Proposing Economy(ies)

United States 

Co-Sponsoring Economies

Canada; China; Japan; Korea; Malaysia; Mexico; Singapore; Chinese Taipei; Peru; Russia; Thailand 

Expected Start Date

01/10/2012 

Expected Completion Date

30/09/2016 

APEC Funding

497,500 

Co-funding Amount

1,540,800 

Co-funding Percentage

75.59% 

Total Project Value

2,038,300 

Project Proponent Name 1

Kathryn Armstrong (new PO wef 26 October 2015) 

Job Title 1

Regulatory Counsel, Office of Drug Security, Integrity and Recalls (ODSIR) 

Organization 1

United States Food and Drug Administration 

Postal Address 1

10903 New Hampshire Blvd, Sil Spring, Maryland 20903, USA 

Telephone 1

1-301 8650872 

Fax 1

Not Applicable 

Email 1

Kathryn.Armstrong@fda.hhs.gov 

Project Proponent Name 2

Not Applicable 

Job Title 2

Not Applicable 

Organization 2

Not Applicable 

Postal Address 2

Not Applicable 

Telephone 2

Not Applicable 

Fax 2

Not Applicable 

Email 2

Not Applicable 

Declaration

Kathryn Armstrong 

Project Summary

Topic: Global Medical Product Quality and Supply Chain Integrity

Background and Need: APEC and non-APEC economies are adversely impacted by the international movement of spurious, substandard, falsified, falsely-labelled and counterfeit (SSFFC) medical products. As the medical products industry has become more globalized and specialized, APEC economies must increasingly rely on the global marketplace to provide the medical products needed to keep citizens healthy and ensure trade in legitimate products is not disrupted. Specific areas that should be explored, include, but are not limited to, a) good distribution practices, b) controls on components used as part of good manufacturing practices and quality management systems, c) import and export practices, d) dispensing practices via the internet, e) detection technologies, and f) establishment of a single point-of-contact (SPOC) within each APEC economy. 


Planned Activities, Possible Timing and Locations: This proposed APEC multi-year project includes activities focused on developing and implementing processes and procedures directed at regulatory convergence to efficiently enhance global medical product quality and supply chain integrity. This effort is both necessary and consistent with the APEC RHSC (Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee)/LSIF VISION 2020: A Strategic Framework for Regulatory Convergence for Medical Products by 2020. Anticipated activities are outlined later in this proposal.

Relevance

APEC should undertake this project since the integrity of global drug and medical device supply chains is seriously threatened and is negatively impacting the health of populations living within the APEC community. Implementation of the activities described in this proposal will support regional economic integration by driving regulatory convergence in critical areas, and will result in expanded trade and increased access by patient populations throughout APEC economies to high quality, safe and effective medical products. This project responds directly to APEC priorities of regional economic integration, supply chain integrity and regulatory convergence. It also directly supports the APEC Health Working Group (HWG) mandate to plan and prepare for health-related threats to economies, trade and security, focusing mainly on naturally-occurring and intentionally caused health threats in the APEC region by mitigating the use of substandard medicines that are known to be the cause, for instance, of drug-resistant bacteria responsible for increased incidences of tuberculosis and malaria. The Strategic Framework leading to this proposal has been endorsed by the RHSC, LSIF, CTI and APEC Ministers.

This proposal is based upon an RHSC roadmap that was adopted by the LSIF as a means of defining a multi-year, multi-stage strategy to promote product quality and supply chain integrity through regulatory convergence. It also takes account of and incorporates the APEC LSIF Anti-counterfeit Medical Products Action Plan. The roadmap and this companion funding proposal will serve as a catalyst for coordinated, effective global action involving APEC economies and stakeholders as well as key international partners, including the World Health Organization.

Anticipated activities include the following:
·      Gap assessment of relevant regulatory practices affecting supply chain integrity across APEC.
·      Development of a Strategic Plan
·      Development and Dissemination of Tool Kits
·      Promotion of Public Awareness and Establishment of an APEC Single Point of Contact System for Drug Safety
·      International Workshops for implementing recommendations contained in Tool Kits

Objectives

Three (3) Key Objectives.


·
      In concert with the APEC Health Working Group (HWG), develop and implement a strategic plan for securing the supply chain of medical products throughout APEC economies. The strategic plan will include consideration of regulatory and policy issues related to the distribution chain from wholesalers/distributers to patients.

·      Enable convergence of regulatory requirements covering areas as identified in the gap analysis, including but not limited to, Good Distribution Practices (GDPs), pertinent elements of current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs) and quality management systems (QMS), good import and export practices (GI/EPs), product authentication and traceability, related regulatory practices influencing the security of the medical product supply chain, and the evaluation of implementing a single point of contact (SPOC) system by participating economies for the sharing of information related to suspect and non-conforming medical products. 

·      Ensure the strategic plan is developed and implemented with worldwide stakeholder input by conducting a series of workshops intended to facilitate an understanding of current and future best practices for regulators and the development of Tool Kits and guidance documents in concert with the APEC Harmonization Center.

Multi-Year Approach

Multi-year APEC funding is requested because it is necessary to address quality and supply chain issues holistically. No single regulatory authority having jurisdiction over medical products can stem the increasing tide of SSFFC medical products that are moving in international commerce. Products sold for use as approved product in a given economy are now moving globally and entering markets for which they were never intended through a complex web of globalized transportation pathways. To this end, APEC, through the RHSC of the Life Sciences Innovation Forum, is a unique venue that lends itself to international collaboration on a scale not previously in existence. While many of the APEC regulatory authorities have divergent capabilities and resources, all have primary concerns about the quality, safety and effectiveness of the medical products to which their patient populations are exposed. Since these products arrive at ports-of-entry through complex transportation pathways, the regulatory authorities must evaluate more than manufacturing systems. They now need to look at areas such as import/export practices, distribution practices, traceability and authentication rules, and other systems impacting the availability of medical products in the APEC community. This requires a much higher level of understanding, collaboration and exchange of information than can possibly be achieved through a shorter term funding cycle.

TILF/ASF Justification

This project is funded by the TILF Special Account. Although it is not expected to directly impact trade tariffs amongst APEC economies, it is expected to positively impact non-tariff trade barriers as identified in Part 1, Section C of the Osaka Action Agenda. Specifically, implementation of this project is expected to normalize technical trade barriers between APEC economies while elucidating the scientific and technical basis for good regulatory practices by creating transparency among all project participants. Consequently, collective work product generated from this project can be used to inform APEC of non-tariff trade impediments to the movement of a large variety of medical products in international commerce. Moreover, it will support regulatory capacity building of human resources in a manner that will yield significant improvements to the quality, safety and efficacy of medical products moving in international commerce.


Finally, in accordance with Part 2 of the Osaka Action Agenda, work product generated from implementation of this project will result in
a collective road mapping of key scientific technologies related to health amongst all APEC economies.

Beneficiaries and Outputs

Step 1. Gap Analysis of Required Systems and Practices

A gap analysis will be conducted to identify the current state of supply chain integrity impacting APEC economies and to assess what is needed for economy-wide and regional efforts in APEC economies and on the global level with respect to:

·      Capacity: Legal, regulatory, enforcement, and laboratory ·      Standards/regulatory convergence:  Identifying appropriate areas where standards development and regulatory convergence are needed ·      Information sharing:  Including technological means and needs ·      Collaboration and cooperation: Identifying global and regional venues for collaboration and cooperation and oversight of implementation of the roadmap, bringing together regulators, industry, law enforcement, border protection agencies and other important stakeholders.        

Systems to be evaluated in the gap analysis (utilizing the above criteria) will likely address areas including, but not limited to:

·      Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and Quality Management Systems (QMS) Affecting Supply Chain Security ·      Good Distribution Practices (GDP) ·      Good Import and Export Practices (GI/EP) ·      Product Identification, Authentication and Traceability ·      Detection Technologies for Determining the Legitimacy of Medical Products ·      The Proper Role of Internet Sales of Medical Products ·      Establishment of a Single Point-of-Contact System

Step 2: Development of a Strategic Work Plan

Based upon the results of the Gap Assessment, develop a Strategic Work Plan addressing the concerns identified in the Gap Assessment. The Strategic Work Plan shall encompass the development of Tool Kits that shall identify best practices needed to remedy the gaps in medical product security and supply chain integrity. The Strategic Work Plan shall also cover training methods and similar mechanisms for disseminating appropriate Tool Kits across APEC and non-APEC economies.

Step 3:  Development of Tool Kits and other relevant materials

Tool Kits comprised of guidelines, best practices, standards, training materials and modules, will be developed addressing the issues identified in the gap analysis. Appropriate entities operating in APEC economies, such as standards organizations, multi-lateral organizations, or others can be identified to lead such efforts.   

Step 4:  Training

A training curriculum will be developed based on the strategic work plan and appropriate entities, such as standards development organizations, multi-lateral organizations, or others may be identified to develop or conduct such training.  Toolkits and other relevant materials developed in support of the strategic work plan will be used to conduct appropriate workshops and seminars to APEC economies and other stakeholders, such as industry, medical product regulatory authorities, health care professionals, and others. 

Step 5:  Assessments

Assessments shall be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the training programs within member economies and determine if any modifications are needed. Training would be updated/revised and conducted with assistance from other APEC economies and/or the RHSC or other entity, as appropriate.  Use of case studies based on actual implementation of given topics will be developed.

Dissemination

There is no intention to sell any work product arising from this project. The target audience includes national regulatory authorities, all industries regulated by national regulatory authorities, and other stakeholders concerned with the quality, safety, and efficacy of medical products moving in international commerce.

All Tool Kits developed under the Strategic Work Plan will be the subject of train-the-trainer programs for use by national regulatory authorities and, where appropriate, their industry constituents. All Tool Kits will be distributed through these programs and will also be made available electronically via the website of the APEC Harmonization Center.


It is anticipated that there will be at least one Tool Kit developed for each gap analysis conducted, with a corresponding training program following. Each Tool Kit will contain written guidelines and other documents that can be used by national regulatory authorities and their constituent industries to establish effective systems that will mitigate the movement of SSFFC medical products in international commerce.

Gender

Recognizing that most participants in this project will need scientific and technical backgrounds, and that women have historically been underrepresented in disciplines requiring these backgrounds, the Oversight Committee, like the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee, will make every effort to ensure that equal participation by women is will nonetheless be accomplished.

Currently, approximately one half of the 40-member Oversight Committee is comprised of women. If this proportion appears to trend in a manner in which women appear to be underrepresented, the Oversight Committee will inform the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee, which will seek advice from the APEC Policy Partnership on Women and the Economy on how to reverse such a trend.

Work Plan

This project is anticipated to take up to five (5) years, with a planned beginning of October 1, 2012. The initial step of organizing an Oversight Committee to enable project implementation has already been achieved through nominations provided by the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee. Although it is anticipated that additional members will be added to the Oversight Committee, the current membership is comprised of subject matter experts from national regulatory authorities, global drug and medical device experts from both the innovator and generic industries, and the World Health Organization, among others.

In implementing this project, the first task of the Oversight Committee is to conduct a gap assessment which will lead to the identification and categorization of the greatest threats to the security of global medical products and supply chain integrity. This should take approximately through the first quarter (calendar year) of 2013. Thereafter, one project lead will be chosen from the Oversight Committee to address each of the several, identified threats to supply chain integrity. In each instance, the project lead will be responsible for surveying existing, documented practices across APEC to determine how such practices vary, and to isolate the best, most effective and affordable practices. Some of the areas anticipated to be examined during this stage include import/export practices, good distribution practices, good manufacturing practices, available detection technologies, and the implementation of a Single Point of Contact tool when SSFFC medical products are detected or encountered. In total, this effort will begin in the first quarter of 2013, and is expected to endure through the first quarter of 2014.

Immediately upon completion and assembly of the Gap Assessment, a subcommittee of the Committee will provide a draft Strategic Work Plan. This Strategic Work Plan will specify each of the actions needed to address the threats to the global supply chain of medical products. In doing so, it will make recommendations for legal, statutory, or regulatory practices that are needed for securing the global supply chain, and will identify and recommend outreach methodologies to provide the greatest amount of training for stakeholders with the least amount of cost. It is anticipated that the development of area-specific Tool Kits containing written guidelines and other documents will be used for training purposes. It is also anticipated that recommendations for the use of webinars and other pathways will be incorporated into the Strategic Work Plan. Finally, the Strategic Work Plan will also provide recommendations for assessment of all training programs undertaken by the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee and implemented by the Oversight Committee.  The Strategic Plan should be finalized by the end of the third quarter, 2014.


Thereafter, Tool Kits comprised of written guidelines and other documents will be developed for each area identified in the Gap Assessment. These Tool Kits will be made available globally through the APEC Harmonization Center, and will be the subject of area-specific training programs. Project leads and their teams will work closely with the Training Subcommittee of the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee in developing these Tool Kits, and for the curriculum to be designed for implementing the Tool Kits. All Tool Kits should be developed and ready for use by the end of the first quarter of 2015. At that time, dissemination of Tool Kits and training methodologies will begin. Training will be cost-effective, and will meet other criteria specified by the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee (e.g., be designed as “train-the-trainer” programs). Training will be extended to all interested stakeholders since global supply chain integrity cannot be obtained without consideration of all import and export countries.

Risks

By far, the greatest risk in implementing this project is that there will be insufficient engagement of national regulatory authorities and their constituents to meaningfully develop workable, effective mechanisms for preventing the introduction of SSFFC medical products to commerce. However, this project is subject to the oversight of the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee, which has been quite effective in encouraging and maintaining participation by regulatory authorities.

Further, all members of the project’s Oversight Committee were nominated by the regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee and it is has been agreed that Oversight Committee members can be replaced for lack of active participation.


In addition, part of what is expected of the Oversight Committee is to reach out to industry, academia, and non-governmental organizations within their respective economies to support the work of the Oversight Committee. To this end, much has already been done, but it is expected that far more outreach will be successfully accomplished as this project is undertaken.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Project monitoring will be overseen by the RHSC. The existing RHSC Training Subcommittee will perform project monitoring for the train-the-trainer workshops and will consult with relevant APEC fora to assess metrics and conduct surveys among APEC stakeholders to obtain feedback on the effectiveness of activities and to obtain recommendations for future activities. For each workshop conducted participants will complete a workshop evaluation form that will be carefully reviewed and suggestions will be incorporated into future workshops. The Training Subcommittee will also report on a routine basis to RHSC, the LSIF Planning Committee, HWG and other involved APEC fora on results and will seek feedback and guidance. Information collected from workshop participants will include - name, economy, rating of the workshop, speakers, moderators, agenda and workshop organization, recommendations on how to improve the workshop and suggestions for future APEC drug safety and drug supply chain workshops.  Overall project Metrics to be assessed include reduction of reported incidences of injury and death within APEC economies due to unsafe medical products, prosecution of criminals producing or distributing unsafe medical products, number of APEC economies developing single point of contact systems, and the use by APEC economies of the guidance documents and Tool Kits prepared in the implementation of this proposal.

Linkages

APEC Fora.  From the outset, other APEC forums that will be involved in the planning and implementation of activities included in this proposal will initially include the APEC HWG, the APEC Harmonization Center, and the Anti-Corruption Task Force. APEC HWG has fully endorsed this proposal as being important to ensuring the health and welfare of patient populations throughout APEC by working toward access to medical products that are known to be of high quality, safe and efficacious. Thus, throughout implementation of this project, the HWG will be consulted to provide relevant experts on matters related to proper dispensing and use of medical products throughout APEC markets. Similarly, the APEC Harmonization Center will be actively involved by serving as the Secretariat to the Oversight Committee appointed by the RHSC for project implementation. Moreover, the APEC Harmonization Center will coordinate all meetings necessary to facilitate project implementation. Finally, the Anti-Corruption Task Force will be drawn upon to provide expertise in the development of a Single Point of Contact System to enable quick public awareness and reporting of suspect and non-conforming products throughout the APEC region.

Non APEC Fora.  The World Health Organization (WHO) will be involved in planning and implementation of the project due to both the project’s public health focus and its global implications. Other non-APEC stakeholders include the European Medicines Agency, international Pharmacopeia, and other international organizations including private sector, non-profit organizations, as appropriate. Government and industry representatives from a limited number of non-APEC economies will be invited to serve as expert speakers and participants in the Oversight Committee. APEC participants will benefit from non-APEC participation since non-APEC economies are a significant part of the global medical product supply chain. In turn, the World Health Organization and all other non-APEC participants will be able to leverage the work product derived from this project by incorporating it into their work streams to further assist in maintaining the security of medical products moving in international commerce.

Previous Work. The activities proposed under this proposal supports previous APEC LSIF activities related to the quality, safety and efficacy of medical products, including APEC projects covering counterfeit medicines, quality in manufacturing (specifically, Quality-by-Design), and multi-regional clinical trials.    

Importantly, this project is governed by the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee, whose overarching operating principle, as described in the Strategic Framework, is to take account of and not duplicate the work of initiatives within APEC and other organizations.  It is for this reason that key international organizations have been invited to participate in this global exercise.

APEC’s Comparative Advantage.  As a multi-lateral organization, APEC is distinct from other multi-lateral venues as it applies to this project. First, many APEC economies are involved in a number of otherwise unlinked activities related to regulatory convergence (e.g., the Pan-American Network for Regulatory Harmonization, the ASEAN Pharmaceutical Product Working Group, and the Asian Health Working Party. For these economies, APEC therefore serves as a common denominator that facilitates the exchange of sound, science and risk-based practices that can be shared among all APEC economies, as well as non-APEC economies. Second, although every single country and economy in the world is affected to some extent by the movement in international commerce of SSFFC products, APEC also encompasses the South East Asian region that the World Health Organization has determined to be one of the most susceptible to international movement of such non-conforming products. In addition, there is a wealth of subject matter experts in the region. Hence, the increased risk to patients and corresponding additional costs to health systems caused by the international movement of SSFFC medical products are well understood.

Project Management

Operational management of this project will be provided by an Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee shall be comprised of subject matter experts (SMEs) nominated by the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee. It is chaired by Mark Paxton, USFDA, who will report directly to the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee. The Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee shall retain final responsibility for ensuring compliance with APEC funding requirements.

The Oversight Committee will be supported by the APEC Harmonization Center, which shall serve as the project Secretariat, will coordinate all training and capacity building projects resulting from project implementation, and, along with the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee, ensure compliance with APEC funding requirements. The APEC Harmonization Center is located in Seoul, Korea, and has a long, established record in providing logistical support to the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee while ensuring compliance with APEC requirements.

Should the Project Overseer change over the life of this Project, the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee will nominate and confirm a new Project Overseer, who shall simultaneously serve as the new Chairperson of the Oversight Committee. Such a change may also be made at any time since the Project Overseer and Oversight Committee Chairperson serves at the leisure of, and reports to, the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee.

Sustainability

Following exhaustion of APEC funding, all APEC and non-APEC economies will have consistent, appropriate tools at their disposal to address threats to supply chain integrity for all medical products. While implementation of these tools will continue long after the APEC Roadmap is concluded, it is expected that collaboration among national regulatory authorities will continue so long as continued and perhaps new threats arise that affect the quality, safety and effectiveness of medical products moving in international commerce.

 

To this end, the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee will endure as a mechanism with APEC to continue needed collaborations to ensure greater integrity of supply chains and distribution channels for covered medical products. Moreover, this project brings together elements of a number of existing regional and global regulatory participants including the World Health Organization (WHO), the Pan American Network on Drug Regulatory Harmonization (PANDRH), and the Pharmaceutical Product Working Group of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). In each instance, efforts to curb the trade in SSFFC products has been substantial, but heretofore, ineffective. Once APEC funding for this project expires, it is highly anticipated that each of these regional and global bodies will continue to adapt and implement the tools arising from this project to further secure the integrity of medical product supply chains. As noted above, the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee is in the best position to maintain continuity among these bodies, and to coordinate the building of additional tools, as needed. 

Project Overseers

Mark S. Paxton serves not only as the Project Overseer, but also was named Chairperson of the Oversight Committee for project implementation. Mark is a Regulatory Counsel in the CDER Office of Compliance within the US FDA. In that capacity, Mark is responsible for developing a wide range of supply chain security policies. Prior to joining FDA, Mark served as Associate Vice-President, International Regulatory Affairs at the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (“PhRMA”). There, Mark established and managed a number of work programs with drucvg regulatory authorities throughout China, East Asia, India, Europe and Latin America. These efforts were designed to assist regulators and constituent companies operating in emerging markets to better understand complex regulatory issues arising from the globalization of the pharmaceutical industry. Mark was also responsible for leading PhRMA’s technical efforts to secure the supply chain and distribution channels of pharmaceutical products marketed across the globe. In doing so, Mark worked closely with manufacturers and their trading partners in distribution centers, hospitals and retail pharmacies to identify and assess interoperability issues associated with a variety of proposed serialization, authentication, and track-and-trace systems.


Mark is a regulatory attorney by education, experience and training, and prior to joining PhRMA was in private practice in Lexington, Kentucky where he focused his practice on food and drug law. Mark received his B.S. (1991) and M.S. (1993) degrees in Economics from the University of Kentucky, and his J.D. from the University of Dayton School of Law in 1998.

Cost Efficiency

This project is designed to be efficient in many ways. First, it relies upon the direct labour of subject matter experts residing in national regulatory authorities – all of whom are passionate about the need to ensure that all patients should have access to high quality medical products that are known to be safe and effective.

Second, this project will rely heavily upon institutions within APEC that were established for the purpose of the type of work contemplated under this project. These institutes include the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee and the APEC Harmonization Center.

Finally, this effort is intended to leverage the activities of other organizations that are concerned with the widespread availability of SSFFC medical products. This currently includes work underway at the World Health Organization and a number of pharmacopeia (e.g., US Pharmacopieia, European Directorate for Medicinal Quality) – all of whom are represented on the Oversight Committee. As this project moves forward, other organizations are fully expected to be nominated to participate.

Drawdown Timetable

Nil.

Direct Labour

It is not anticipated that any funds obtained from APEC under this project will be utilized to hire or retain employees or consultants. Rather, most of the work required under this project will be provided by the sponsoring and co-sponsoring economies as in-kind contributions.

Waivers

Waivers are requested as follows:


1.
   
Costs related to the retention of simultaneous interpreters during training sessions –  if needed and where appropriate.

2.    Advance travel expenses for travel-eligible travel participants and experts for training programmes.

3. 
Travel expenses for government experts from non-travel eligible economies are absolutely essential to this RoadMap since much of the expertise needed for gap assessments of regulatory practices and the conduct of training programmes specifically currently resides with government experts from many of these economies.

Are there any supporting document attached?

No 
Attachments
Version: 6.0 
Created at 22/02/2013 15:57  by System Account 
Last modified at 14/02/2019 14:32  by Lucy Phua 
Version HistoryVersion History

Project No.

Project Title

Project Status

Publication (if any)

Fund Account

Sub-fund

Project Year

Project Session

Sponsoring Forum

Topics

Committee

Other Fora Involved

Other Non-APEC Stakeholders Involved

Proposing Economy(ies)

Co-Sponsoring Economies

Expected Start Date

Expected Completion Date

APEC Funding

Co-funding Amount

Co-funding Percentage

Total Project Value

Project Proponent Name 1

Job Title 1

Organization 1

Postal Address 1

Telephone 1

Fax 1

Email 1

Project Proponent Name 2

Job Title 2

Organization 2

Postal Address 2

Telephone 2

Fax 2

Email 2

Declaration

Project Summary

Relevance

Objectives

Multi-Year Approach

TILF/ASF Justification

Beneficiaries and Outputs

Dissemination

Gender

Work Plan

Risks

Monitoring and Evaluation

Linkages

Project Management

Sustainability

Project Overseers

Cost Efficiency

Drawdown Timetable

Direct Labour

Waivers

Are there any supporting document attached?

hdFldAdmin

Project Number

Previous Fora

Secretariat Comments

Reprogramming Notes

Endorsement By Fora

Consolidated QAF

PD Sign Off

Batch

Forum Priority

Committee Ranking Category

Committee Priority

PDM Priority

Priority Within Funding Category

Monitoring Report Received

Completion Report Received

PMU Field 1

PMU Field 2

PMU Field 3

On Behalf Of

Originating Sub-Forum

Approval Status
Attachments
Content Type: MYP Proposal
Version:
Created at by
Last modified at by
Go Search